Drawing for MANAGED MOBILITY

USPTO serial 76363349

MANAGED MOBILITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MANAGED MOBILITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein

Martin R. Greenstein TechMark a Law Corporation4820 Harwood Road, 2nd FloorSan Jose, CA 95124-5273UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software used for personal information managers, wired, wireless and cellular communications, synchronization, connectivity assistance and data exchange between wired and wireless devices; voice, data, image and wired or wireless communication software, namely, e-mail, voice mail, voice messaging, synchronization and exchange of digital files, data and graphical information and personal information; user interface software for wireless communications, Internet access and web browsing; computer software used for data import and export; computer software used for data backup, restore and synchronization; connectivity management software; mobile terminal management software; computer software used for data encryption and secure transmission; computer software and communications servers used for network synchronization; software programming tools for use in developing, maintaining, enhancing and operating computer programs, wired, wireless and cellular telephones and communications devices, and computer systems; computer utility programs and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewithACTIVE—
042Professional, technical and consulting services, namely, consultation in the fields of computers, Personal Digital Assistants (PDA's), Connected Information Devices (CID's) and computer software; custom design of computer hardware and computer software for others; synchronization services provided to others, namely, providing a service of synchronizing files and data between and among computer systems, computer peripherals and personal organizers; data encryption servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 17, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance