USPTO serial 76364019
SEND IN THE CLONES WE HAVE THE BUFFERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2888191Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2004
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEND IN THE CLONES WE HAVE THE BUFFERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Clifford Mull
W. Clifford Mull WALTER & HAVERFIELD LLPSUITE 35001301 E. NINTH STREETCLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | High Purity biological buffers, reagent biochemicals, and specialty chemicals for use in molecular biology and scientific cloning applications; diagnostic chemicals and cell cultures for use in scientific research | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Research Organics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Research Organics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Research Organics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named SEND IN THE CLONES WE HAVE THE BUFFERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 2, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |