USPTO serial 76364044
ADTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. G. Horowitz
Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising agency services, dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet, conducting business and market research surveys | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | communications services, namely, transmitting streamed audio and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; electronic delivery of images and photographs via a global computer network; electronic, electric and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals, and messages; streaming of audio material on the Internet; streaming of video material on the Internet; video-on-demand transmission services; webcasting services; television broadcasting via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring audio and video materials, namely, musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, movies, television programs, photographs and other multimedia materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | hosting of digital content on the Internet; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; updating of computer software for others; maintenance and repair of computer software; computer software design and development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sony Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named ADTV
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |