USPTO serial 76364262
PAPITO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4016146Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 23, 2011
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PAPITO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, CA
Los Angeles, CA
ISACO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Miami Lakes, FL
ISACO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Miami Lakes, FL
ISACO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Miami Lakes, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Smilie
Scott W. Smilie PATZIK, FRANK & SAMOTNY LTD.150 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 1500CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WEARING APPAREL FOR MEN AND CHILDREN, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, HATS, UNDERGARMENTS, WARM UP PANTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, SWEAT SHORTS, SWIMWEAR, BATHING SUITS, BEACH AND BATHING COVERUPS, TOPS, JACKETS, COATS, KNIT SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, PULLOVERS, VESTS, TANK TOPS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 8, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LAMOUR BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Papi Sportswear, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ISACO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ISACO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ISACO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PAPITO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 23, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |