USPTO serial 76364305
I-ASSESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I-ASSESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Livingston, West Lothian, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James B. Muskal, Esq.
JAMES B MUSKAL ESQ LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601-6780UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING TESTING SERVICES; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS ALL FOR TRAINING, AND INSTRUCTING IN THE FIELDS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTERS, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS, REGULATORY LICENSING AND TESTING, MARKETING AND RECRUITMENT; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CORRESPONDENCE COURSES AND INFORMATION ALL RELATING TO EXAMINATIONS, TESTING AND TEACHING; PROVIDING ON-LINE DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER DATABASES FOR TRAINING STUDENTS AND CANDIDATES IN THE FIELD OF GRADUATE SCHOOL EDUCATION, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS, REGULATORY LICENSING AND TESTING, MARKETING AND RECRUITMENT; EDUCATIONAL CONSULTANCY SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION RELATED THERETO; COMPUTER BASED TUITION, TRAINING, TESTING, ASSESSMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING OF CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS FOR EDUCATIONAL AND/OR TRAINING PURPOSES | ACTIVE | Aug 22, 2001 |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES RENDERED FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DESIGN OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS, NAMELY, COMPUTER SYSTEM ANALYSIS; MAINTENANCE AND UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; LEASING OF COMPUTER AND LEASING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING, DESIGNING, MAINTAINING AND IMPLEMENTING DATA BASES, NETWORKS AND WEBSITES FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING INFORMATION ONLINE RELATING TO THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF WEBSITES, DATA BASES AND NETWORKS; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF WEBSITE, DATA BASE AND NETWORK DEVELOPMENT; CONSULTANCY, INFORMATION AND ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO ALL OF THE AFORESAID SERVICES | ACTIVE | Aug 22, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |