Drawing for OPTIC LITES

USPTO serial 76364337

OPTIC LITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTIC LITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric lights for Christmas trees featuring either one or both of electric lights and fiber optic lightsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2020WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2020WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 19, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 20, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 21, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 15, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 1, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 18, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 4, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 16, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance