Drawing for SPINAL CONTOUR

USPTO serial 76364424

SPINAL CONTOUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPINAL CONTOUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Carrillo

MICHAEL A CARRILLO NEAL GERBER & EISENBERG2 N LASALLE ST STE 2200CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Beds, mattresses and box springsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 28, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 28, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 22, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 11, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 16, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 16, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 16, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 15, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 15, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 15, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 25, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 16, 2002OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance