USPTO serial 76364807
O2K NEURO-NUTRITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 23, 2004
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with O2K NEURO-NUTRITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Matol Biotech Laboratories Ltd.
Pointe Claire, Quebec, CA
Matol Biotech Laboratories Ltd.
Pointe Claire, Quebec, CA
Matol Biotech Laboratories Ltd.
Pointe Claire, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON VENABLE, BAETJER, HOWARD ET AL1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3917UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS NAMELY PROTEIN BARS, PROTEIN DRINKS, HERBAL DROPS AND NEUTRACEUTICALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Matol Biotech Laboratories Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Matol Biotech Laboratories Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Matol Biotech Laboratories Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named O2K NEURO-NUTRITION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |