USPTO serial 76364866
OMEGA SERIES ACCESSORIES THE LAST WORD IN PAINTBALL EQUIPMENT ACCESSORIES & MODIFIED PARTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OMEGA SERIES ACCESSORIES THE LAST WORD IN PAINTBALL EQUIPMENT ACCESSORIES & MODIFIED PARTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lehigh Acres, FL
Lehigh Acres, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Paintball components there of pertaining tp modification or improvement of performance of paintball guns/markers | ACTIVE | Dec 7, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Adamson, Todd
- Other trademarks owned by Pickering-Adamson, Tami
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named OMEGA SERIES ACCESSORIES THE LAST WORD IN PAINTBALL EQUIPMENT ACCESSORIES & MODIFIED PARTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |