USPTO serial 76364869
CHEF'S NECESSITIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEJESUS, YSA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHEF'S NECESSITIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mike & Diane's Gourmet Kitchen Compliments
El Cajon, CA
Other trademarks owned by Mike & Diane's Gourmet Kitchen Compliments
Mike & Diane's Gourmet Kitchen Compliments
El Cajon, CA
Other trademarks owned by Mike & Diane's Gourmet Kitchen Compliments
MIKE & DIANE'S GOURMET KITCHEN, INC.
EL CAJON, CA
Other trademarks owned by MIKE & DIANE'S GOURMET KITCHEN, INC.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | sauces and condiments, namely, marinades, hot sauce, pepper sauce, barbecue sauce, cooking sauces, dipping sauces, salad dressings, vinegars, infused vinegars, blended vinegars, flavored vinegars, spices, spice mixes, seasoning blends, dry rubs seasoning, wet rub seasoning, mustards, flavored mustard, salt, sea salt, salt blends | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mike & Diane's Gourmet Kitchen Compliments
- Other trademarks owned by Mike & Diane's Gourmet Kitchen Compliments
- Other trademarks owned by MIKE & DIANE'S GOURMET KITCHEN, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CHEF'S NECESSITIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |