Drawing for SAMSON'S KOSHER

USPTO serial 76364894

SAMSON'S KOSHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAMSON'S KOSHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer D. Silverman

JENNIFER D SILVERMAN REED SMITH, LLP599 LEXINGTON AVE 29TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029kosher beefACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 12, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 18, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 4, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 5, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 5, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 29, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance