USPTO serial 76364971
KALASHNIKOV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KALASHNIKOV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-42651 Solingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J BELLUS
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | KNIVES, NAMELY, HUNTING, FOLDING, CHEF, KITCHEN, BUTCHER, PARING, FISHING, SPORT, KNIVES FOR HOBBY USE, KNIVES FOR PICNIC USE, GARDENING, PRUNING, RAZORS AS A HAND-OPERATED TOOL, FIXED BLADE KNIVES, SWITCHBLADE, COMBAT KNIVES, SCOUTING KNIVES, SHEATH KNIVES, FARMING KNIVES, AND DIVE KNIVES; POCKET KNIVES, TABLE KNIVES, MACHETES; BLADES FOR ALL AFOREMENTIONED KNIVES; HAND-OPERATED TOOLS, NAMELY, SCREWDRIVERS; BLADES FOR ALL SCREWDRIVERS; ALLEN WRENCHES, PLIERS, SCISSORS, NAIL FILES; MULTIPLE FUNCTION FOLDING POCKET TOOL, CONSISTING OF A POCKET KNIFE, BLADES, SCISSORS, FORKS, SAWS, BOTTLE CAP OPENERS, SCREWDRIVERS, PLIERS, WIRE-CUTTERS, CAN OPENERS AND CAN PIERCERS, SCISSORS, MANICURE SETS, KNIVES, FORKS, SPOONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |