USPTO serial 76365071
KING OTIS AND THE KINGDOM OF GOODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KING OTIS AND THE KINGDOM OF GOODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN G LINIHAN
MARTIN G LIMIHAN HODGSON RUSS LLPONE M&T PLZ STE 2000BUFFALO, NY 14203-2391UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | games and playthings, namely dolls, puppets, plush toys, stuffed toys, soft sculpture toys, plastic character toys, play gyms, toy dish sets, toy combs and brushes, play sets comprised of play environments with toy buildings and toy figurines and board games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |