USPTO serial 76365197
ARTISTRY ENTERTAINMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARTISTRY ENTERTAINMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lake Stevens, WA
Lake Stevens, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa T. Oratz
LISA T ORATZ PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE 48TH FLSEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DOWNLOADABLE MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS; VIDEO GAMES AND MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | TALENT AGENCY SERVICES; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS VIA THE INTERNET, DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED AND AUDIO PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS, AND PERSONAL CONTACTS; ON-LINE RETAIL STORE FEATURING MUSIC AND SHEET MUSIC; ARTIST INCUBATION SERVICES, NAMELY, IDENTIFYING, DEVELOPING, SECURING DISTRIBUTION AND FUNDING FOR AND BRINGING TO MARKET ARTISTIC TALENT; AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, MUSIC PUBLISHING, MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE PUBLISHING; VIDEO GAME AND AUDIO VISUAL CONTENT PUBLISHING; MUSIC COMPOSITION FOR OTHERS, MUSIC PRODUCTION SERVICES; PRODUCTION OF MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER AND VIDEO GAMES FOR OTHERS; DISTRIBUTION OF ON-LINE MUSIC VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND MOTION PICTURE SONG PRODUCTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LICENSING AND CONSULTING SERVICES; DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER, VIDEO, AND ELECTRONIC GAMES AND MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Soule, Jeremy
- Other trademarks owned by Soule, Jeremy
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ARTISTRY ENTERTAINMENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |