USPTO serial 76365407
TOMORROW'S LEGACY TODAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOMORROW'S LEGACY TODAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SALLY L DAVIS
SALLY L DAVIS S C JOHNSON & SON INC1525 HOWE STRACINE, WI 53403-2236UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED REPORTS, PAMPHLETS, BOOKLETS, BROCHURES, NEWSLETTERS IN THE FIELD OF CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY, INFORMATION RELATING TO CHARITABLE ACTIVITIES AND CHARITABLE OPPORTUNITIES IN THE COMMUNITY | ACTIVE | Jan 11, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2004 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |