Drawing for ADVANTAGE

USPTO serial 76365499

ADVANTAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADVANTAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Joseph Schaeff

B JOSEPH SCHAEFF DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP1 S MAIN ST STE 1300ONE DAYTON CTRDAYTON, OH 45402-2023

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printing blanketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 9, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 9, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 9, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 7, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 5, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance