Drawing for SENEGENCE INTERNATIONAL

USPTO serial 76365745

SENEGENCE INTERNATIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARIN, AMY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SENEGENCE INTERNATIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly Kepler

Kimberly Kepler SENEGENCE INTERNATIONAL19651 ALTERFOOTHILL RANCH, CA 92610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics and personal care products, namely, lipstick in solid or liquid form, lip liner, lip gloss, lipstick remover, eye liner, eyebrow liner and mascaraACTIVEOct 1, 2000
009Audio video materials, namely, preprogrammed videotapes and compact discs, for use in retail merchandising and distribution services for various goodsACTIVEOct 1, 2000
016Printed paper products, namely, product displays and product literature, for use in retail merchandising and distribution services for various goodsACTIVEOct 1, 2000
035Rendering technical assistance in connection with the establishment and/or operation of person-to-person retail merchandising of various goods, namely, cosmetics and personal care productsACTIVEOct 1, 2000
042Distributorship services for various goods, namely, cosmetics and personal care productsACTIVEOct 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance