USPTO serial 76365748
Serial No. 76365748
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76365748?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY M. KEATS, ESQ
ANTHONY M KEATS ESQ KEATS, MCFARLAND & WILSON LLP9720 WILSHIRE BLVDPENTHOUSE STEBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | POSTERS; COASTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |