Drawing for ENOVA

USPTO serial 76365779

ENOVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3184163Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 12, 2006
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENOVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary E. Innis

Susan Upton Douglass Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, PC866 United Nations PlazaNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical additives for use in the manufacture of food, beverages and dietary supplementsSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDNov 17, 2004
029Cooking oils and fats; edible oils and fats; edible oils and fats for use as ingredients in the manufacture of beverages and foods, namely, soups, mayonnaise, dressings, snack food dips, spreads, icings, frostings, sauces, frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; potato chips; potato crackers; potato-based snack foods; and protein-based, nutrient dense snack bars; rice and corn-based snack chips, crackers and snack foods; breads, pastries, cookies; frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; frozen pizzas; and candies and candy barsSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDDec 17, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2010C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Apr 8, 2010CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 31, 2010CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jul 30, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 4, 2007PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 7, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 17, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 18, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 16, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 4, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 13, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 1, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 23, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 16, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 24, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance