USPTO serial 76365791
MESHNETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MESHNETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carolyn E. Knecht
CAROLYN E KNECHT AS437MOTOROLA INC600 N US HWY 45LIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR WIRELESS BROADBAND APPLICATIONS THAT PROVIDE VOICE, DATA, STREAMING MEDIA, AND GEOLOCATION TO USERS OF PERSONAL COMPUTERS AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES SUCH AS PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, AND CELLULAR TELEPHONES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | WIRELESS BROADBAND SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING VOICE, DATA, STREAMING MEDIA, AND GEOLOCATION VIA WIRELESS MEANS SUCH AS PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, AND CELLULAR TELEPHONES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |