USPTO serial 76365915
EPICAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4054321Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 15, 2011
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EPICAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL-7609 KL Almelo, NL
NL-7609 KL Almelo, NL
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Nishi
John C. Nishi Dickinson Wright, PLLC1875 Eye Street, NW, Suite 1200International SquareWashington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations for use in the treatment of heart disease and heart conditions, diabetes, menstrual disorders, blood pressure problems, cardiovascular problems, lipid metabolism disorders, asthma, arthritis, arthrosis, tinnitus, periodontosis, anemia, cell deficiencies and cancer; vitamins and minerals for medical purposes; food supplements for dietary purposes, consisting primarily of vitamins, amino acids and trace elements; dietetic supplements for non-medical use, namely, amino acids and trace elements; nutritionally fortified beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Candy and other sweets, namely, pastilles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Effervescent sticks and effervescent tablets for making drinks and beverages; mineral and carbonated water; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, fruit drinks, fruit juices, lemonades and soft drinks; syrup and other preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks, fruit juices, and soft drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rath, Matthias Dr.
- Other trademarks owned by Rath, Matthias Dr.
- Other trademarks owned by Rath, Matthias Dr.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named EPICAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |