Drawing for LINESAVER

USPTO serial 76365979

LINESAVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3047244Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2006
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with LINESAVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEVIN M. BOVARD

KEVIN M. BOVARD BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP2929 Arch StreetCira Centre, 12th FloorPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2891

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Services for maintenance of water linesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2026CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 24, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2017A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Apr 14, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 9, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 9, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 6, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 10, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 24, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2012ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 7, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 29, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 14, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance