USPTO serial 76366181
FLOOR-SEAT MASK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2982288Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 2, 2005
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLOOR-SEAT MASK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Lasky
Robert J. Lasky Arnstein & Lehr LLP120 S. Riverside Plaza, suite 1200Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | SELF-ADHERING POLYURETHANE FILM USED TO COVER CLOTH AND CARPETING IN VEHICLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 10, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |