USPTO serial 76366224
THIERICA AUTOMATION GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2731437Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2003
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THIERICA AUTOMATION GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ingrid A. Jensen
INGRID A JENSEN LAW, WEATHERS & RICHARDSON, PC333 BRIDGE ST NW STE 800GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49504UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Custom manufacture of robots, robotic stations and robotic systems, namely individual work units to automate production steps or a complete manufacturing process, to the order and specification of others; Custom manufacture of automated finishing systems to the order and specification of others; Custom manufacture of electric control panel and automation and process control systems and loading/unloading systems to the order and specification of others; Custom manufacture of robotics for paint finishing to the order and specification of others; Custom manufacture of automatic parts feeding and assembly equipment to the order and specification of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2001 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting training seminars in the field of robotic maintenance; conducting training programs in the field of robotics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thierica, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Thierica, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Thierica, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THIERICA AUTOMATION GROUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |