Drawing for NUCLEAR SKULL -N- BONES

USPTO serial 76366231

NUCLEAR SKULL -N- BONES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUCLEAR SKULL -N- BONES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS AND HATSACTIVEFeb 28, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 27, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 2, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 5, 2006WDLLRESPONSE TO WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY PROCESSED—
Apr 5, 2006WDLAWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY APPROVED—
Oct 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance