USPTO serial 76366239
ALL DAY I DREAM ABOUT CLOTHES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALL DAY I DREAM ABOUT CLOTHES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING ITEMS NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEAT PANTS, JACKETS, HATS, SOCKS, UNDERWEAR, TANK TOPS, JEANS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, BLOUSES, SHOES, SWEATERS, PANTS, KHAKIS, CAPS, COATS, BLAZERS, SLACKS, BRAS, BELTS, HEADBANDS, WRISTBANDS, JERSEYS, POLO SHIRTS, BUTTON UP SHIRTS, GLOVES, SCARF, PURSES, TOWELS, PAJAMAS, BATH ROBES, BATHING SUITS, BATHING TRUNKS, TURTLE NECKS, LEATHER JACKETS, LINGERIE, VESTS, SHORTS, BOXER SHORTS, TUBE TOPS, HALTER TOPS, CAMISOLES, BAGS, JEAN SHIRTS, CAPRIS, LONG SLEEVE TSHIRTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |