Drawing for "PEOPLE YOU CAN RELY ON AND WORK WITH"

USPTO serial 76366253

"PEOPLE YOU CAN RELY ON AND WORK WITH"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with "PEOPLE YOU CAN RELY ON AND WORK WITH"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cindy L. Caditz, Esq.

CINDY L CADITZ ESQ CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Construction services, namely, building construction and repair, construction management, construction of interior space improvements, construction planning, construction supervision, custom construction of interior space improvements; carpentry contractor services; drywall contractor services; installation of drywall; building painting, painting contractor services; application of plaster, stucco, faux finishes, and fire-rated coatings; and installation of fireproofing systems, namely cementitious structures, fibrous-based fireproofing structures, and intumescent fireproofing; and installation of fire-resistant assemblings and structural metal studding for interior and exterior building supportACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 16, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 10, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Dec 29, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance