USPTO serial 76366351
MONALISA POWDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONALISA POWDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David T. Nikaido
DAVID T NIKAIDO RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLCLION BLDG STE 5011233 20TH STWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Soy protein for use as nutritional ingredient in various powdered and ready-to-drink beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Soy-enhanced packaged and frozen prepared entrees and snacks consisting primarily of meat, poultry, fish, soy-enhanced cheese or seafood with side dishes consisting of vegetables, soy-enhanced rice, and/or potatoes; soy-enhanced stews and preparations for making soup, namely soup cubes; soy-enhanced cream; processed soybean powder and liquid for use as a food additive; soy protein as a food additive; and soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Soy-enhanced cereals, breads, bagels and crackers; soy-enhanced cakes, pastries, pies, brownies, biscuits, tarts, waffles, doughnuts, muffins, danishes, cookies, and crepes; soy-enhanced pizza, sandwiches and rice; soy-enhanced soba, udon, ramen and pot noodles; soy-enhanced ice cream, sherbets, dessert soufflés and frozen yogurts; soy-enhanced coffee, tea and cocoa; soy-enhanced tapioca, sago and coffee substitute; soy-enhanced mayonnaise, salad dressings and mustard; soy-enhanced condiments, namely, barbecue sauces and chili sauces; and soy-enhanced spices | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Soy-enhanced non-alcoholic fruit drinks and vegetable juices; soy-enhanced carbonated and flavored soft drinks; and soy-enhanced syrups and other preparations for making fruit drinks, vegetable juices and carbonated and flavored soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JAPAN CELLFOODS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by JAPAN CELLFOODS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MONALISA POWDER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |