Drawing for CRICKETPRO

USPTO serial 76366393

CRICKETPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRICKETPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory P. Goonan

GREGORY P GOONAN THE AFFINITY LAW GROUPONE AMERICA PLZ600 W BROADWAY STE 400SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Support services for businesses, namely, record keeping, and professional and administrative services namely, business consultation concerning available telecommunications products and services, cost and pricing of telecommunications services, billings strategies and issues, and financial and payment issues regarding telecommunications products and servicesACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, local, long distance and international transmission of voice, data, text, facsimile, video, advertising, gaming, and graphics, by means of telephone, cable, satellite, wireless and handheld and PDA devices and the Internet; providing access to directory services by telephone, cable, satellite, wireless and handheld and PDA devices and the Internet; electronic mail and voice messaging services, namely, recording, storage and subsequent transmission of messages by telephone, cable, satellite, wireless and handheld and PDA devices and the Internet; computer-aided transmission of messages and images; transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via telephone, cable, satellite, wireless and handheld and PDA devices and the Internet; paging services; communications exchange services telephone, cable, satellite, wireless and handheld and PDA devices and the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 17, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance