Drawing for CLASSROOM MANAGER

USPTO serial 76366419

CLASSROOM MANAGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLASSROOM MANAGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lucian Wayne Beavers

LUCIAN WAYNE BEAVERS WADDEY & PATTERSON414 UNION ST STE 2020BANK OF AMERICA PLZNASHVILLE, TN 37219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use as a teacher control interface for hardware music teaching systems, for providing a linking environment for other music instructional software; for relating to non-teaching techniques in music education, particularly, gradebook usage, for attendance and seating information and for student progress tracking all used in the field of music educationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 24, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 24, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 16, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 16, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 2, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 26, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 16, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 31, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance