USPTO serial 76366571
WWW.TAPRODUCE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WWW.TAPRODUCE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerome F. Politzer, Jr.
JEROME F POLITZER JRP O BOX 4070SALINAS, CA 93912-4070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Pre-cut fresh vegetables and pre-cut garden salads | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2003 |
| 031 | Fresh vegetables | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2003 |
| 035 | wholesale distributorship services in the field of fresh vegetables, vegetable salads, and other fresh food products; business consultation and business management services in the field of agriculture, namely, providing consultation and management featuring production of fresh vegetables, vegetable salads, and other fresh food products, communication with customers, and product purchasing, consolidation, and marketing; business information services in the field of agriculture, namely, providing business information featuring production of fresh vegetables, vegetable salad, and other fresh food products, communication with customers, product purchasing, consolidation, and marketing, analysis of industry news and trends, and reports of production and development; association services, namely, promoting the interests of the agricultural industry through combination of services, activities and member benefit programs; retail stores in the field of agricultural seed, nursery stock, agricultural chemicals, and agricultural supplies; procurement, namely, purchasing farm products after harvest for others, namely, fruits, grains, hay, nuts, vegetables, animal products, or any other product produced on the farm for others | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2003 |
| 042 | Agricultural research and food product quality research in the processing and preparation of agricultural products for consumption; computer hardware development; services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; installation of computer software; computer programming for others; repair of computer software | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TANIMURA & ANTLE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TANIMURA & ANTLE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WWW.TAPRODUCE.COM
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |