USPTO serial 76366784
NUSHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3486725Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2008
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NUSHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
British Columbia V7J 3H7, CA
British Columbia V7J 3H7, CA
British Columbia V7J 3H7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles H. DeVoe
CHARLES H DEVOE KOLISCH, HARTWELL, DICKINSON, MCCORMACK520 S W YAMHILL ST STE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cereal-based food rolls, namely, meat rolls, cheese rolls, vegetable rolls, sandwich rolls, salad rolls, rolled pizza snacks, fruit rolls, crepe rolls; rice based westernized sushi rolls; sushi | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Restaurant and carry-out restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nushi Restaurants of Canada
- Other trademarks owned by Nushi Restaurants of Canada
- Other trademarks owned by Nushi Restaurants of Canada
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named NUSHI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2007 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |