USPTO serial 76367042
FRESH WIPES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 4, 2003
- Examiner
- MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FRESH WIPES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fairfield, IA
Fairfield, IA
BLAUVELT, NY
ARLINGTON, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R. Graif
Michael R. Graif Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | CLEANING CLOTHS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Harper Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Harper Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by CASABELLA HOLDINGS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by TXF PRODUCTS ACQUISITION INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named FRESH WIPES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |