USPTO serial 76367274
REGISTERED E-MAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2928365Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 22, 2005
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REGISTERED E-MAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PEMBROKE, HM, BM
PEMBROKE, HM 08, BM
Hamilton, BM
Hamilton, BM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John K. Fitzgerald
John K. Fitzgerald RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP611 Anton Boulevard, 14th FloorCosta Mesa, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | delivery of messages by electronic transmission to a designated recipient to provide results on a basis equivalent to the results obtained by registered mail | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RPOST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by RPOST COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by RPOST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by RPOST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named REGISTERED E-MAIL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2015 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | CTDA | CT DECISION: AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 7, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |