Drawing for PRICK INDEX

USPTO serial 76367641

PRICK INDEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRICK INDEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erik M. Pelton

ERIK M PELTON ERIK M PELTONPO BOX 100637ARLINGTON, VA 22210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed publications, namely, screenplays, movies and theatrical scripts and books on the subject of the pain caused by failed relationshipsACTIVEJun 17, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2008MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Nov 16, 2008ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Nov 1, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 18, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 18, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2008CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 27, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 18, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 8, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 22, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 10, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 26, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 17, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance