Drawing for RED CARPET SERVICE

USPTO serial 76367782

RED CARPET SERVICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
Law office
PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RED CARPET SERVICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Welch, Esq.

JOHN L WELCH ESQ FOLEY HOAG LLP155 SEAPORT BLVDBOSTON, MA 02210-2600UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial analysis and consultation; financial information provided by electronic means; financial information processing; financial management; financial planning; financial portfolio management; financial research; financial services in the nature of an investment security; financial services, namely providing on-line stored value accounts in an electronic environment; financial services, namely, investment fund transfer and transaction servicesABANDONEDDec 17, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 24, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 24, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 19, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 4, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance