USPTO serial 76367901
LEGACY EDITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEGACY EDITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas Mesiti, Esq.
NICHOLAS MESITI ESQ HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI PC5 COLUMBIA CIRALBANY, NY 12203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | swimming pools primarily made of steel | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |