USPTO serial 76367996
PRO-VIDE CLOVER AND CHICKORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2812182Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 10, 2004
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRO-VIDE CLOVER AND CHICKORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BROUSSARD, LA
New Roads, LA
New Roads, LA
New Roads, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Waddell
Robert L. Waddell Jones Walker LLPP.O. Box 3408Lafayette, LA 70502-3408UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | food plot seed | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Nov 26, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WILDGAME INNOVATIONS, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Newman, Matthew
- Other trademarks owned by Newman, Matthew
- Other trademarks owned by Newman, Matthew
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named PRO-VIDE CLOVER AND CHICKORY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |