USPTO serial 76368092
I-BUDDIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I-BUDDIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 SLATERS LN FOURTH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS, MICROPROCESSORS, MOTHERBOARDS, SEMICONDUCTORS, COMPUTERS, COMPUTER MEMORIES, COMPUTER INTERFACES, HARD DISK DRIVES, COMPACT DISK DRIVES, COMPUTER MICE, COMPUTER KEYBOARDS, COMPUTER PLOTTERS, ALSO KNOWN AS PEN PLOTTERS OR ELECTROSTATIC PLOTTERS, PORTABLE COMPUTERS, DATA RECORDING MACHINES, ALSO KNOWN AS TAPE RECORDERS, READ ONLY RECORDING MACHINES, ALSO KNOWN AS CD-ROMs, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, FOR USE IN NETWORK COMMUNICATION, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, NAMELY, FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT RECORDED ON OPTICAL OR MAGNETIC DISKS, BLANK MAGNETIC DISKS, BLANK OPTICAL DISKS, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, AND ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2003 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |