USPTO serial 76368422
CASTLE HILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CASTLE HILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Arlington Heights, IL
Arlington Heights, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morgan L. Fitch, Jr.
MORGAN L FITCH JR FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Condiments, namely, mustard, mayonnaise, horseradish, marinades, cocktail sauce, tartar sauce, relish, salad dressing and ketchup | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |