Drawing for AUTOEQUIPPER

USPTO serial 76368469

AUTOEQUIPPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOEQUIPPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein, Esq.

Martin R. Greenstein TechMark a Law Corporation4820 Harwood Road, 2nd FloorSan Jose, CA 95124-5273UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROVIDING AUTOMOTIVE AND VEHICULAR INFORMATION VIA THE INTERNET OR COMPUTER NETWORKS RELATING TO REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE, PARTS, CUSTOMIZATION AND SERVICES INFORMATION; PROVIDING AUTOMOTIVE AND VEHICULAR INFORMATION VIA THE INTERNET OR COMPUTER NETWORKS RELATING TO SPECIFICATION AND PERFORMANCE REVIEWS OF VEHICLES, SELECTION, AVAILABILITY, FEATURES, COMPARISONS, WARRANTIES, DEALERS, MANUFACTURERS, AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES AND SERVICES PROVIDERS, AS WELL AS TRADE INFORMATION ABOUT GENERAL INDUSTRY NEWS; ADVERTISING AND BUSINESS SERVICES, NAMELY, THE DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA AN ONLINE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK TO SHOP FOR AND LOCATE AUTOMOBILES AND OTHER VEHICLES, AND TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT AUTOMOBILES AND OTHER VEHICLES, AND PARTS, ACCESSORIES AND SERVICES FOR SAMEACTIVEJan 25, 2002
042Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; computer software design for others; computer consultation; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software and computer services, namely, creating, maintaining and hosting web sites for a global computer network for the purpose of advertising automobiles and other vehicles for sale or lease, providing automotive-related services and providing general information and specifications about automobiles and other vehicles, and parts, accessories and services for automobiles and other vehiclesINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 17, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 17, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 14, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 23, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 15, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 10, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance