Drawing for BULLFROG

USPTO serial 76368471

BULLFROG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WINTER, ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BULLFROG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R Greenstein, Esq.

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN ESQ TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST SIXTEENTH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer; mineral waters, aerated waters, carbonated waters, flavored waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, punches, soft drinks, smoothies and lemonades; sports drinks; energy drinks; isotonic drinks, hypertonic drinks and hypotonic drinks, for use and/or as required by athletes and those engaged in active or stressful sports and activities; fruit juices and fruit drinks, vegetable juices and vegetable drinks; syrups, powders, concentrates and effervescent tablets for making drinks and beverages; nonalcoholic cocktails and drinksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 12, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 6, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance