USPTO serial 76368486
MEDITERRANEAN CAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2004
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MEDITERRANEAN CAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeanette S. Zimmer
JEANETTE S ZIMMER SCHIFF HARDIN LLPPO BOX 06079CHICAGO, IL 60606-0079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | PROVIDING FOOD AND DRINK SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE NATURE OF SELF-SERVICE AND TAKE-OUT RESTAURANTS LOCATED IN FOOD COURTS, WHICH PARTICULARLY FEATURE GREEK AND MEDITERRANEAN CUISINE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |