Drawing for TIPO FERRARI

USPTO serial 76368518

TIPO FERRARI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIPO FERRARI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD E. BEE

RICHARD E BEE155 TERR CTCOSTA MESA, CA 92627UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Automotive engine oils, automotive engine oil additives, automotive lubricants, automotive greases, automotive fuel additives, automotive transmission fluids and transmission fluid additives, automotive radiator coolants and radiator additivesACTIVEJan 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 26, 2002IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Oct 2, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance