USPTO serial 76368629
Serial No. 76368629
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76368629?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Hampton, NY
East Hampton, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hayley Werner
HAYLEY WERNER PAUL WEISS RIFKIND WHARTON ET AL1285 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10019-6028UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Charitable fund raising | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 1999 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction at the primary, secondary, higher learning and continuing education levels; arranging and conducting educational conferences and providing educational services, namely, conducting seminars, workshops and conferences in the fields of cultural history, English, science, math, foreign language, visual arts, performing arts, technology, media studies, self-awareness, religion, spirituality, health, dance, physical fitness and wellness, yoga and meditation; providing courses of instruction over the global communications network in the field of cultural history, English, science, math, foreign language, visual arts, performing arts, technology, media studies, self-awareness, religion, spirituality, health, dance, physical fitness and wellness, yoga and meditation; the distribution of course material in connection therewith; training and instruction for educators in a membership group in the fields of cultural history, English, science, math, foreign language, visual arts, performing arts, technology, media studies, self-awareness, religion, spirituality, health, dance, physical fitness and wellness, yoga and meditation; and organizing lectures in the fields of cultural history, English, science, math, foreign language, visual arts, performing arts, technology, media studies, self-awareness, religion, spirituality, health, dance, physical fitness and wellness, yoga and meditation, and summer camps | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |