USPTO serial 76368635
ROSS VIRTUAL SCHOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROSS VIRTUAL SCHOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Hampton, NY
East Hampton, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hayley Werner
HAYLEY WERNER PAUL WEISS RIFKIND WHARTON ET AL1285 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10019-6028UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting awareness with respect to matters related to education, cultural history, English, science, math, foreign language, visual arts, performing arts, technology, media studies, self-awareness, religion, spirituality, health, dance, physical fitness and wellness, yoga and meditation, communications, technology, health care, well-being, performing arts, international exchange and environmental concerns | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction at the primary, secondary, higher learning and continuing education levels, arranging and conducting educational conferences and providing educational services, namely, conducting seminars, workshops and conferences in the fields of cultural history, English, science, math, foreign language, visual arts, performing arts, technology, media studies, self-awareness, religion, spirituality, health, dance, physical fitness and wellness, yoga and meditation, the distribution of course material in connection therewith, training and instruction for educators in a membership group and promoting and organizing lectures over the global communications network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |