USPTO serial 76368668
PRINCESS ABITA NATURAL SPRING WATER SOURCE: ABITA SPRINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRINCESS ABITA NATURAL SPRING WATER SOURCE: ABITA SPRINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Bottled Water | ACTIVE | Oct 10, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DeWald Construction Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by DeWald Construction Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by DEWALD, JACK J
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PRINCESS ABITA NATURAL SPRING WATER SOURCE: ABITA SPRINGS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |