USPTO serial 76368793
CDLAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CDLAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-8708 Mannedorf, CH
CH-8708 Mannedorf, CH
MANNEDORF, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angelo Notaro, Peter C. Michalos, John Zaccaria, Chih-Sheng Lin
JOHN ZACCARIA NOTARO & MICHALOS PC100 DUTCH HILL RD STE 110ORANGEBURG, NY 10962UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus, namely, an integrated combination of a microcentrifuge and microcentrifuge rotor for microanalysis, microsynthesis, purification and sample preparation | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical apparatus, namely, an integrated combination of a microcentrifuge and microcentrifuge rotor for microanalysis, microsynthesis, purification and sample preparation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TECAN TRADING AG
- Other trademarks owned by TECAN TRADING AG
- Other trademarks owned by TECAN GROUP LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named CDLAB
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |