USPTO serial 76368930
RPP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RPP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGISTERED FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
MIDDLETOWN, OH
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGISTERED FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGISTERED FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
MIDDLETOWN, OH
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGISTERED FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWIN P. MORROW III
EDWIN P MORROW III MORROW LAW OFFICE LLCP O BOX 42665MIDDLETOWN, OH 45042-0665UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | financial services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGISTERED FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGISTERED FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class B
- Similar marks named RPP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |