USPTO serial 76368953
FIG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPKINS, TRICIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth H. Ohriner
NORMAN J PROVOST SEMPRA ENERGYHQ-11101 ASH STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Tools, machinery and equipment used for installing, operating, inspecting and maintaining fiber optic cables and related components and systems in natural gas and other surface and subsurface conduits and pipelines, including cable routers, pullers and pushers, pipeline cutting and drilling equipment, pumps, temporary natural gas supplies, manipulators, compressors, air lock housings, and related equipment; Components and fittings used for installing, operating, inspecting and maintaining fiber optic cables in natural gas and other surface and subsurface conduits and pipelines, including drilling/sawing nipples, glands and seals, cable leaders and nose pieces, cable parachutes, and related components, including combinations of components in a kit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |